Saturday, June 19, 2004

Some words on what the war on terror is about

Senator Joe Lieberman Speaks to the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy's Symposium on “Iraq's Future and the War on Terrorism”. He minces no words describing the issues.
The terrorists can never defeat us militarily. But they can divide us and defeat us politically if the American people become disappointed and disengaged, because they don't appreciate and support the overriding principles that require us to take military action. The same, of course, is true for our allies in Europe, Asia and throughout the Muslim world. They need to better understand and embrace our purpose and what it means for them.

What we are fighting for in Iraq and around the world is freedom. What we are fighting against is an Islamic terrorist totalitarian movement which is as dire a threat to individual liberty as the fascist and communist totalitarian threats we faced and defeated were in the last century.

What we are fighting for is an expanding worldwide community of democracies. What we are fighting against is the prospect of a new evil empire, a radical Islamic caliphate which would suppress the freedom of its people and threaten the security of every other nation's citizens.

Lieberman goes on to explain what motivates the Moslem extremist and their logic(?) better than the White House ever did.
There is no better way to know this enemy than to read their words. The father of the jihadist movement, Sayyed Qutb [KUH-tahb] of Egypt, wrote in 1952, “The death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood.” The cause of which he speaks is to “establish a [Muslim] state” that “sets moral values,” “abolish[es] man-made laws” and that would impose, by force if necessary, the Islamic system on “all human beings, whether they be rulers or ruled, black or white, poor or rich, ignorant or learned.”

This is a radicalized, violent vision of Islam, as yet embraced by only a minority of Muslims. Pluralism of any kind – a diversity of views or faiths – affronts this radical minority's absolutist vision. Their theological totalitarianism leaves no room for individual freedom.

Restoring the caliphate – the seat of secular and ecclesiastical power that existed for centuries across a wide territory – is their goal. You can read it in their writings: They would create a new evil empire, stretching from Istanbul to Islamabad, from Khartoum to Kabul, from Kuala Lampur to Bangkok, and beyond.

Osama Bin Laden is the leading advocate of this jihadist view in the world today, the current mastermind of this malevolent movement. Every American should carefully read his clearly stated words of intention to know why we must defeat him.

In his “Declaration of the World Islamic Front for Jihad,” issued in February 1998, Bin Laden says that “to kill Americans and their allies, both civil and military, is an individual duty of every Muslim… every Muslim who believes in God and hopes for reward [must] obey God's command to kill the Americans and plunder their possessions wherever he finds them and whenever he can.”

In his November 1998 “Letter to America,” Bin Laden condemned the United States because, he said, like all democracies, it is a “nation who, rather than ruling by the Sharia of Allah in its Constitution and Laws, chooses to invent your own laws as you will and desire.” After September 11th attacks, he gloated triumphantly that “the values of Western civilization… of liberty, human rights, and humanity, have been destroyed.”

In this war of ideas and values, Bin Laden is the quintessential anti-American.


Instapundant wishes Joe Lieberman would run on the Kerry ticket. I find myself wishing he was on the Bush ticket.

3 Comments:

On 6/20/2004 06:06:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

While I agree with mr Liebermans conclusions I remain mindful of and concened about the historical and contemporary economic exploitation of third world nations by european powers. I hope that any authoritative vision of "world peace" would include plans to aid in the developement of the third world purely on the basis of doing the right thing and making partners of potential enemies.

 
On 1/16/2006 11:27:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lieberman's failure to acknowledge more innocent Muslim deaths at the hands of the Western interests than casualites the jihadists have caused in our world is the index to his honesty.

If you leave out how many of them we have killed in our interest, an Islamic extremist movement seems diabolical. Shame on you, Joe.

 
On 1/16/2006 07:37:00 PM, Blogger Liberty said...

Maybe the fact that we are killing more of them, than them of us means we are winning. In the words of Martha, "Its a good thing."

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home >>